This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Morita, T. Articles by Chihara, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Morita, T. Articles by Chihara, S. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Cancer Cancer--Living with Cancer Family Issues Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Perceptions and decision-making on rehydration of terminally ill cancer patients and family members

Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan

Junichi Tsunoda, MD

Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan

Satoshi Inoue, MD

Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan

Satoshi Chihara, MD

Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan

Although the appropriateness of forced rehydration for terminally ill cancer patients has been actively discussed, few studies have investigated its psychological aspects. To clarify patients’ and family members’ perceptions about rehydration and identify contributing factors for decision-making, a prospective structured survey was performed on 121 hospice inpatients with insufficient oral intake.

Physicians did not recommend rehydration in 78 percent of patients, and 75 percent decided not to receive artificial fluid therapy. Various concerns affected decision-making: 76 percent of patients and 85 percent of family members believed patients could not get appropriate nutrition without artificial rehydration. Some 56 percent of patients and 84 percent of family members said that withholding rehydration would cause premature death, while more than half agreed that forced rehydration might worsen the patients’ suffering.

Patients’ performance status, fluid retention signs, denial, physicians’ recommendations, patients’ and family members’ beliefs about the effect of hydration on patients’ distress, and family members’ anxiety about withholding rehydration were significantly associated with decision-making. Multiple regression analyses revealed patients’ denial, physicians’ recommendations determined by patients’ performance status and fluid retention symptoms, and family members’ belief that rehydration could worsen patients’ distress as independent determinants for rehydration.

In conclusion, hospice care receivers had various concerns about rehydration, related to patients’ nutrition, survival, and distress. The main determinants for rehydration therapy were patients’ performance status, fluid retention symptoms, denial, and care receivers’ beliefs about the effect of hydration on the patients’ distress.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, Vol. 16, No. 3, 509-516 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/104990919901600306


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Miyashita, T. Morita, Y. Shima, R. Kimura, M. Takahashi, and I. Adachi Nurse Views of the Adequacy of Decision Making and Nurse Distress Regarding Artificial Hydration for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Nationwide Survey American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2008; 24(6): 463 - 469. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Miyashita, T. Morita, Y. Shima, R. Kimura, M. Takahashi, and I. Adachi Physician and Nurse Attitudes Toward Artificial Hydration for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients in Japan: Results of 2 Nationwide Surveys American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, November 1, 2007; 24(5): 383 - 389. [Abstract] [PDF]