Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Felt, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Welk, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Felt, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Welk, T. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Attitudes, values, beliefs, and practices surrounding end-of-life care in selected Kansas communities

Diane Heilman Felt, MPH, RD, LD

Susan B. Allen Memorial Hospital, El Dorado, Kansas

James L. Early, MD

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, Kansas

Thomas A. Welk, DMin

Hospice, Inc., Wichita, Kansas

Objective: This study was designed to better meet end-of-life care needs for patients and their families in rural Kansas communities.

Methods: Initially, statistical information indicated an underutilization of hospice services in rural communities. To evaluate the data, focus groups were conducted in targeted communities in order to determine attitudes, values, beliefs, and practices surrounding end-of-life care. A script was developed using established focus group protocols. Each focus group was recorded and the tapes were transcribed. Transcripts were reviewed and categorized for similarities and emerging key issues.

Results: Five major areas of concern were identified using this methodology. Major concerns were: (1) participants believed that control over decisions about care at the end of life is the patient’s right; (2) while participants saw a need for advance directives, they avoided using them; (3) group participants believed that the patient’s wishes should be given first priority and this was viewed as a patient’s right; (4) there was an expressed lack of trust in the existing health care system and its providers; and (5) participants expressed more fear over the manner of death than death itself. They fear a technological death as opposed to a good death.

Conclusions: The values most important to the group participants included: freedom and independence, trust, honesty, the right to information, and the importance of family. This information will be utilized in the development of programs and interventions to effect changes in end-of-life care, not only in Kansas, but also in areas with a comparable population.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, Vol. 17, No. 6, 401-406 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/104990910001700611


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement