This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ryan, A. Articles by Berger, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ryan, A. Articles by Berger, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

You need not make the journey alone: Overcoming impediments to providing palliative care in a public urban teaching hospital

Symptom Management and Palliative Care Program, LAC+USC Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

Jackie Carter, RN MSN

Symptom Management and Palliative Care Program, LAC+USC Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

Janet Lucas, LCSW

Symptom Management and Palliative Care Program, LAC+USC Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

Jack Berger, MD, PhD

Symptom Management and Palliative Care Program, LAC+USC Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

The majority of dying patients continue to receive care in acute, tertiary settings. This has generated the development of hospital-based palliative care (HBPC). The Symptom Management and Palliative Care Program (SMPCP) at LAC+USC Medical Center provides HBPC. The SMPCP operates as an interdisciplinary consultative service, assessing inpatients, and documenting recommendations for primary physicians. Over a 28-month period the SMPCP provided clinical recommendations, education, and research for patients, family members, and hospital staff. Demographic, clinical, psychosocial, financial, and outcome information was collected on 265 patients. The SMPCP documented the attainment of defined quality end-points, including pain control within 24 hours, a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) discussion with patient and family within 72 hours, and control of nausea and vomiting within 24 hours. Team members also documented impediments to implementing recommendations and the success of interventions to overcome impediments. Results indicated that the SMPCP achieved a high rate of quality end-point attainment when impediments were not present. The most significant impediments resulted from behaviors by primary physicians. The SMPCP’s ability to overcome barrier behaviors improved the rate of end-point attainment, confirming the importance of palliative care at the end of life.

Key Words: acute care • demographics • education • hospital • impediments • interdisciplinary team • outcomes • palliative care • quality • symptoms • terminal care

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, Vol. 19, No. 3, 171-180 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/104990910201900308


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. A. Bailey, K. L. Burgio, L. L. Woodby, B. R. Williams, D. T. Redden, S. H. Kovac, R. M. Durham, and P. S. Goode Improving Processes of Hospital Care During the Last Hours of Life Arch Intern Med, August 8, 2005; 165(15): 1722 - 1727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]