SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bridge, M.
Right arrow Articles by Koch, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bridge, M.
Right arrow Articles by Koch, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Using caregivers-as-proxies to retrospectively assess and measure quality of dying of palliative care clients

Marie Bridge, GradCertPalCare

Palliative Care Unit, Royal District Nursing Service South Australia Inc., Adelaide, Australia

D. I. Roughton, GradCertPalCare

Palliative Care Unit, Royal District Nursing Service South Australia Inc., Adelaide, Australia

Susan Lewis, GradDipHlthCnsl

Palliative Care Unit, Royal District Nursing Service South Australia Inc., Adelaide, Australia

Janine Barelds, BPsych

Palliative Care Unit, Royal District Nursing Service South Australia Inc., Adelaide, Australia

Sava Brenton, RN

Palliative Care Unit, Royal District Nursing Service South Australia Inc., Adelaide, Australia

Sherree Cotter, BEd

Palliative Care Unit, Royal District Nursing Service South Australia Inc., Adelaide, Australia

Mary-Lou Hagebols, BAdN(Ed)

Palliative Care Unit, Royal District Nursing Service South Australia Inc., Adelaide, Australia

Kirsty Woolman, RN

Palliative Care Unit, Royal District Nursing Service South Australia Inc., Adelaide, Australia

Merilyn Annells, RN, PhD

School of Nursing, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

Tina Koch, RN, PhD

Research Unit, Royal District Nursing Service South Australia Inc., and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

This study evaluated two quality-of-life assessment and measurement tools, the Client Generated Index and the McGill Quality of Life questionnaire, within palliative care nursing. Primarily tested was the feasibility of the tools to assess clients’ QOL at admission and, if necessary, when their condition altered. The reliability of the tools has previously been ascertained. Additionally, quality of dying during the last two days of life for 14 participants who died during the study was assessed and measured retrospectively by these tools, using the client’s nominated care-giver as proxy for the client. It is this second focus that we report on here. The reasons why proxy assessment and measurement of client QOD was not useful or feasible are discussed.

Key Words: quality of life • quality of death • CGI • MQOL • assessment tools • palliative care

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, Vol. 19, No. 3, 193-199 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/104990910201900311


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement