SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vig, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by Pearlman, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vig, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by Pearlman, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

How do surrogate decision makers describe hospice? Does it matter?

Elizabeth K. Vig, MD, MPH

Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, and Geriatrics and Extended Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington

Helene Starks, MD, MPH

Department of Medical History and Ethics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Janelle S. Taylor, PhD

Department ofAnthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Elizabeth K. Hopley, BA

Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Kelly Fryer-Edwards, PhD

Department of Medical History and Ethics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Robert A. Pearlman, MD, MPH

Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, and Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VeteransAffairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington

We interviewed 71 surrogate decision makers of older, chronically ill veterans to explore their knowledge of hospice and their role in helping loved ones access hospice services. We asked them to describe hospice and any previous hospice experiences. Qf the group, 24 percent with hospice experience and 14 percent without hospice experience correctly described three key aspects of hospice: who hospice cares for, where the care is provided, and the goal of the care. Additionally, we found evidence that surrogates who correctly described the three key aspects of hospice were inclined to pursue hospice care for loved ones in the future, and surrogates who provided less complete descriptions of hospice might not access it. Since surrogates often help dying patients access care, incomplete knowledge of hospice may be an important barrier to hospice services. We advocate that clinicians discuss the three key aspects of hospice during routine advance care planning sessions with patients and their future surrogate decision makers.

Key Words: surrogate decision makers • hospice care • advance care planning

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, Vol. 23, No. 2, 91-99 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/104990910602300205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement