SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Black, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Black, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Advance Directive Communication: Nurses’ and Social Workers’ Perceptions of Roles

Kathy Black, PhD, MSW, MSG, MPH

School of Social Work, University of South Florida, Sarasota, Florida., kblack{at}banshee.sar.usf.edu

As a facet of advance care planning for future health care, advance directive communication represents an important aspect of professional health care practice with older patients. Nurses and social workers routinely discuss advance directives in acute care settings; however, communication practices by discipline are not well understood. This qualitative study explored differences in advance directive communication practices by comparing and contrasting nurses’ and social workers’ perceptions of their roles. Focus group interviews were conducted with nurses (n = 6) and social workers (n = 5). Five key themes emerged from the data. Findings suggest that both professions perceive primary educational roles, though their informational practices differed in content. The professionals reported differential pathways that led to their practices with patients. Both disciplines identified advocacy roles with families and providers. The practitioners reported distinct roles with families. There was mutual recognition of interdisciplinary roles. The findings suggest that nurses and social workers engage in both parallel and complementary advance care planning practices with their patients.

Key Words: advance directives • interdisciplinary teams • professional communication • older adults • advance care planning

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, Vol. 23, No. 3, 175-184 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1049909106289080


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement