| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Beyond Polarization, Public Preferences Suggest Policy Opportunities to Address Aging, Dying, and Family CaregivingDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, IByock{at}aol.com, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover New Hampshire
Department of Anesthesiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover New Hampshire
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover New Hampshire Despite well-documented deficiencies and widespread suffering experienced by millions of elderly or ill Americans and their families, politicians rarely address end-of-life issues. Citizen Forums in New Hampshire surveyed 463 people regarding aging, serious illness, and caregiving. More than 80% indicated it was very or extremely important to have their dignity respected, preferences honored, pain controlled, and to not leave family with debt. Less than half strongly endorsed being kept alive as long as possible, prayed with or for, or having assisted-suicide available. Over 80% strongly endorsed palliative care requirements clinical licensure and reimbursement, expansion of family caregiver leave, respite care, and bereavement support. By avoiding actions which elicit strong divergence of opinion and focusing on actions on which consensus exists, public officials and candidates can respond to problems and improve care and experience for frail elders, dying Americans, and their families.
Key Words: family caregiving palliative aging dying policy end of life public opinion
This version was published on June
1, 2009 American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, Vol. 26, No. 3,
200-208 (2009) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||