| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment Scale (CRA-J) for Community-Dwelling Cancer PatientsDepartment of Adult Nursing/Palliative Care Nursing, School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, miyasita-tky{at}umin.net
Department of Adult Nursing/Palliative Care Nursing, School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Adult Nursing/Palliative Care Nursing, School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Gerontological Policy, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan
School of Health Sciences, Nagoya University, Aichi, Japan
Home palliative care support center "rainbow," Miyagi, Japan
Department of Family Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan Background: The aim of this study was to validate the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) among caregivers of community-dwelling advanced cancer patients in Japan. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to advanced cancer patients and their caregivers who were cared for at day hospices and home palliative care services. We translated the CRA into Japanese, and then verified factor validity, reliability, construct validity, concurrent validity, and known groups validity. To address construct and concurrent validity, we calculated Pearsons correlation coefficient between the Japanese version of the CRA and the Burden Index of Caregivers (BIC). To address known groups validity, we used the t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: A total of 57 caregivers participated in the study. Five factors were extracted (impact on schedule, caregivers self-esteem, lack of family support, impact on health, and impact on finances) and reliability was good. Construct and concurrent validity among the subscales of the BIC were good. Regarding known groups validity, the subscale score of impact on schedule for the groups that cared 6 hours or more per day was higher than the other group (P = .04). Conclusion: The CRA-J is valid and reliable. This scale is useful for caregivers of cancer patients in Japan.
Key Words: palliative care neoplasms quality of life caregiving home care services day hospice
This version was published on October
1, 2009 American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, Vol. 26, No. 5,
334-340 (2009) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||