This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1049909109338515v1 26/5/376    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Radwany, S. Articles by Jahangiri, S. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Radwany, S. Articles by Jahangiri, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

End-of-Life Decision Making and Emotional Burden: Placing Family Meetings in Context

Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio

Terry Albanese, PhD

Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio, albaneset{at}summa-health.org

Lynn Clough, PhD

Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio

Linda Sims, PhD

Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio

Hallie Mason, MSN, CRNP

Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio

Sudy Jahangiri, MD

Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio

Background: Helping families make end-of-life care decisions can be challenging for health care providers in an intensive care unit (ICU). Family meetings facilitated by palliative care consult services (PCCS) have been recommended and found effective for improving support for families in these difficult situations. These services can be improved with a deeper understanding of factors associated with emotional burden in the aftermath of end-of-life decision making. Objective: This qualitative study seeks to provide a better understanding of family experiences and emotional burden surrounding end-of-life decision making. Participants and Methods: We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with 23 family members following the death of a loved one in the ICU. All participants had been involved in a PCCS-led family meeting concerning end-of-life decisions about their loved one. Methodology from grounded theory was used to analyze the content of transcripts and to build a theoretical model. Results: From the perspective of the family, decision making at the end of life is described within a theoretical model of salient experiences that are relevant to families’ emotional burdens. Three temporal stages were evident: (1) the illness experience, (2) decision making in the family meeting, and (3) the dying process. However, emotional burden in the form of lingering questions and resentment was more common when families reported having negative experiences during the final hospital stay. Conclusions: Supportive responsiveness from the PCCS for families who have experienced critical incidents or who have unanswered questions or resentment about treatment may be an important consideration to alleviate later emotional burden.

Key Words: end-of-life decision making • family meetings • palliative care consult services • intensive care units • emotional burden • end-of-life care

This version was published on October 1, 2009

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, Vol. 26, No. 5, 376-383 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1049909109338515


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?